Published: January 21, 2025 | 10 min read | Last Updated: January 21, 2025

    Why 60% of Countries Don't Use Daylight Saving Time: The Global DST Debate

    While millions struggle with clock changes twice a year, over 120 countries have never adopted DST—or have abandoned it. Here's why the world is increasingly rejecting the practice.

    Victor

    Creator and maintainer, City Clock

    Victor builds and maintains City Clock. He writes the guides and articles here, and maintains the city and time zone dataset the site runs on.

    Share this article:

    The Surprising Global Picture

    If you live in North America or Europe, daylight saving time probably feels like a universal practice—an inevitable twice-yearly ritual of adjusting clocks and complaining about lost sleep. But here's what might surprise you: most of the world doesn't do it.

    60%
    Countries Without DST
    120+
    Countries Never Adopted It
    40+
    Abandoned DST Since 2000

    Out of 195 countries globally, only about 70 currently observe daylight saving time. That's roughly 40% of countries, covering about 1.6 billion people—less than 20% of the world's population. The rest have either never adopted it or have abandoned it after trying.

    Even more striking: the trend is clearly moving away from DST. Since 2000, more than 40 countries have stopped observing daylight saving time, while virtually none have newly adopted it. So what do these countries know that we don't?

    Countries That Never Adopted DST (And Why)

    China: One Time Zone, No DST

    Despite spanning five geographical time zones, China uses a single time zone (China Standard Time, UTC+8) and has never observed daylight saving time in its modern era.

    The Reasoning:

    • • Political unity: One time zone reinforces national cohesion across a vast territory
    • • Agricultural tradition: Traditional farming schedules don't align with arbitrary clock changes
    • • Simplicity: With 1.4 billion people, avoiding twice-yearly coordination chaos is valuable
    • • Energy argument rejected: Modern studies show DST energy savings are negligible
    Interesting fact: China did briefly experiment with DST from 1986-1991, but abandoned it after complaints from farmers and concerns about disruption to children's school schedules. The government decided the minimal energy savings weren't worth the social costs.

    Japan: Consistency Over Change

    Japan used DST briefly during the US occupation (1948-1951) but has firmly rejected it ever since, despite occasional proposals to reintroduce it.

    Why Japan Says No:

    • • Work culture: Japan's long work hours mean extra evening daylight just means working longer
    • • Health concerns: Studies showed increased heart attacks and sleep issues during clock changes
    • • Technology costs: Updating millions of devices twice yearly is expensive and error-prone
    • • Public opposition: Polls consistently show 70%+ opposition to reintroducing DST

    2008 Proposal: Before the Tokyo Olympics consideration, Japan's government studied reintroducing DST to "promote energy conservation." After comprehensive analysis, they concluded the economic costs (¥1 trillion in IT system updates alone) vastly outweighed any potential benefits. The proposal was quietly dropped.

    India: "Confused Timing" Rejected

    India uses a single time zone (IST, UTC+5:30) for its 1.4 billion people and has never observed DST since independence in 1947.

    India's Reasoning:

    • • Equatorial location: Daylight hours don't vary dramatically between seasons
    • • Agricultural economy: 40%+ of population works in farming with solar-based schedules
    • • Religious observances: Many Hindu and Islamic prayers are tied to sun positions, not clocks
    • • Complexity avoidance: Managing DST across diverse regions would be logistically nightmarish
    When asked about DST in a 2019 government survey, an Indian official responded: "Why would we create confusion twice a year when our current system works fine?"

    Equatorial Countries: No Seasonal Variation

    Countries near the equator (Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, most of Africa, etc.) never adopted DST for a simple reason: it makes no sense there.

    The Science:

    Daylight saving time was designed to "save" daylight in regions where summer days are much longer than winter days. But near the equator, day length varies by less than 30 minutes throughout the year.

    Singapore (1°N)
    Summer: 12h 10min daylight
    Winter: 11h 50min daylight
    Variation: 20 minutes
    London (51°N)
    Summer: 16h 38min daylight
    Winter: 7h 50min daylight
    Variation: 8 hours 48 minutes

    Moving clocks forward one hour when you only gain 20 minutes of seasonal variation makes zero sense.

    Countries That Abandoned DST (And Their Reasons)

    Perhaps even more revealing are the countries that tried DST and then gave it up. These aren't theoretical arguments—these are real-world experiments with concrete results.

    🇷🇺

    Russia (2014)

    After decades of observing DST, Russia permanently abolished it in 2014 after a chaotic experiment with permanent "summer time" from 2011-2014.

    Reason: Public health concerns. Russia's northern latitude meant "permanent DST" resulted in children going to school in complete darkness for months. Reports of increased depression, accidents, and health issues led to reverting to permanent standard time.
    🇹🇷

    Turkey (2016)

    Turkey abolished DST in 2016, choosing to stay on permanent "summer time" (UTC+3) year-round.

    Reason: Economic productivity. Turkish government found that the disruption of clock changes twice a year cost more in lost productivity than any energy savings. They also wanted to align better with Middle Eastern trading partners who don't use DST.
    🇧🇷

    Brazil (2019)

    Brazil ended its decades-long practice of DST in 2019 after a government study concluded it provided no significant benefits.

    Reason: Energy analysis. Brazil's Ministry of Mines and Energy found that DST saved less than 0.5% of electricity—far less than the cost of updating systems and the productivity losses from disrupted sleep schedules. President Bolsonaro signed the bill ending it, stating "the scientific evidence is clear."
    🇦🇿

    Azerbaijan (2016)

    Azerbaijan stopped observing DST in 2016, choosing permanent standard time.

    Reason: Health and coordination. Studies showed increased heart attacks and strokes immediately after spring clock changes. Additionally, being out of sync with neighboring countries during DST complicated business and trade.

    The Science: Why DST Doesn't Work

    Countries abandoning DST aren't just following trends—they're following the science. Modern research has systematically debunked the traditional justifications for daylight saving time:

    ❌ Myth: "DST Saves Energy"

    Reality: Multiple comprehensive studies (US Department of Energy 2008, European Parliament 2019) found energy savings of less than 1%—and some studies found DST actually increases energy use due to more air conditioning in summer evenings.

    Indiana case study (2006): When Indiana adopted statewide DST, economists Matthew Kotchen and Laura Grant used the staggered rollout as a natural experiment and found residential electricity demandincreased by roughly 1%, costing households an estimated $9 million a year. The extra evening daylight meant more air conditioning, offsetting the lighting savings. (Kotchen & Grant, "Does Daylight Saving Time Save Energy?", NBER Working Paper 14429, 2008.)

    ❌ Myth: "DST Reduces Traffic Accidents"

    Reality: A study of two decades of US crash data found roughly a 6% increase in fatal traffic accidents in the week following the spring transition, attributed to sleep disruption — with the effect strongest in the morning and in the western reaches of each time zone. Any evening benefit is offset by darker morning commutes. (Fritz et al., "A Chronobiological Evaluation of the Acute Effects of Daylight Saving Time on Traffic Accident Risk", Current Biology, 2020.)

    ❌ Myth: "DST is Good for the Economy"

    Reality: The often-quoted $434 million annual cost to the US economy comes from Chmura Economics & Analytics' "Lost-Hour Economic Index", which models the productivity drop following the spring change. The health effect is better documented still: a Michigan hospital study found hospital admissions for heart attack rose about 24% on the Monday after spring forward, and fell on the Tuesday after the autumn change. (Sandhu, Seth & Gurm, "Daylight savings time and myocardial infarction", Open Heart, 2014.)

    ✅ What Actually Works

    Countries without DST report: more consistent sleep patterns, fewer clock-change-related health issues, simplified international business coordination, lower technology costs, and no measurable disadvantages compared to DST-observing neighbors.

    The Future: Is DST on the Way Out?

    The global trend is clear: DST is declining. Here's what's happening:

    Growing Movement

    • • European Union: Voted to end mandatory DST by 2021 (delayed but still planned)
    • • United States: Multiple states passed laws to stay on permanent time
    • • Mexico: Abolished DST in most states in 2022
    • • Jordan: Ended DST in 2022 after decades of use

    Barriers to Change

    • • Political inertia and lobbying (retail, golf industries favor DST)
    • • Coordination challenges (states/countries want to change together)
    • • "Permanent DST" vs "Permanent Standard" debate
    • • Technology systems built around twice-yearly changes

    Sleep scientists' recommendation: If DST must be abolished, permanent standard time is healthier than permanent "daylight saving" time. Our circadian rhythms align better with standard time, especially in winter months.

    The American Academy of Sleep Medicine, American Medical Association, and National Sleep Foundation all recommend permanent standard time over permanent DST.

    What This Means for Global Coordination

    For those coordinating across international time zones, the patchwork of DST observance creates significant challenges:

    Current Reality (March-October):

    • • New York and Tokyo: 13-hour difference
    • • But during March 10-31: 14 hours (US on DST, Japan never changes)
    • • Then April-October: Back to 13 hours
    • • Then November-March: 14 hours again

    This creates a 2-week period twice per year where time differences temporarily shift, causing countless missed meetings and scheduling errors.

    Pro Tips for Working with Non-DST Countries:

    • • Always use tools like City Clock that auto-update for DST transitions
    • • Never calculate time differences weeks in advance—always check day-of
    • • Be extra careful in March, April, October, and November
    • • When scheduling with China, Japan, India, or most of Asia/Africa: remember they never change clocks

    Conclusion: The World is Moving On

    The countries that never adopted DST—or that tried it and gave it up—aren't missing out. If anything, they're ahead of the curve. The scientific evidence increasingly shows that daylight saving time provides minimal benefits while imposing real costs in health, productivity, and coordination complexity.

    As more countries abandon the practice, those still observing it face growing pressure to reconsider. The question isn't whether DST will eventually fade away globally—it's when, and whether regions will move to permanent standard time or permanent daylight time.

    Until then, anyone working internationally needs to stay vigilant during DST transition periods. Use reliable tools like City Clock to track time zones in real-time, always verify meeting times during March-April and October-November, and remember: more than half the world has already figured out that constant time is better than changing clocks.

    Related Resources:

    Related Articles

    Privacy & Cookies

    We use cookies to remember your cities and preferences. With your OK, we also use anonymous stats (Google Analytics) and ads (Google AdSense) to keep City Clock free and improving. Accept all or stick to essentials only — your call, and you can change it anytime.